We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
| Implication | Reference |
|---|---|
| 259 \(\Rightarrow\) 260 |
Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
| 260 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 |
Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
| 40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39 | clear |
| 39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 | clear |
| 8 \(\Rightarrow\) 24 | clear |
| 24 \(\Rightarrow\) 26 | Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, 1982, 66 Le¸cons sur la th´eorie des fonctions, Borel, [1898] |
| 26 \(\Rightarrow\) 209 | note-72 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 259: | \(Z(TR\&C,W)\): If \((X,R)\) is a transitive and connected relation in which every well ordered subset has an upper bound, then \((X,R)\) has a maximal element. |
| 260: | \(Z(TR\&C,P)\): If \((X,R)\) is a transitive and connected relation in which every partially ordered subset has an upper bound, then \((X,R)\) has a maximal element. |
| 40: | \(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325. |
| 39: | \(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202. |
| 8: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\): |
| 24: | \(C(\aleph_0,2^{(2^{\aleph_0})})\): Every denumerable collection of non-empty sets each with power \(2^{(2^{\aleph_{0}})}\) has a choice function. |
| 26: | \(UT(\aleph_{0},2^{\aleph_{0}},2^{\aleph_{0}})\): The union of denumerably many sets each of power \(2^{\aleph _{0}}\) has power \(2^{\aleph_{0}}\). |
| 209: | There is an ordinal \(\alpha\) such that for all \(X\), if \(X\) is a denumerable union of denumerable sets then \({\cal P}(X)\) cannot be partitioned into \(\aleph_{\alpha}\) non-empty sets. |
Comment: