Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

100 \(\Rightarrow\) 325 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
100 \(\Rightarrow\) 9	On the existence of large sets of Dedekind cardinals, Tarski, A. 1965, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 162 problem 11.8
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 325	note-46

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
100:	Weak Partition Principle: For all sets \(x\) and \(y\), if \(x\precsim^* y\), then it is not the case that \(y\prec x\).
9:	Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.
325:	Ramsey's Theorem II: \(\forall n,m\in\omega\), if A is an infinite set and the family of all \(m\) element subsets of \(A\) is partitioned into \(n\) sets \(S_{j}, 1\le j\le n\), then there is an infinite subset \(B\subseteq A\) such that all \(m\) element subsets of \(B\) belong to the same \(S_{j}\). (Also, see Form 17.)

Comment:

Back