Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

302 \(\Rightarrow\) 324
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
302 \(\Rightarrow\) 392 clear
392 \(\Rightarrow\) 393 clear
393 \(\Rightarrow\) 165 clear
165 \(\Rightarrow\) 324 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
302:

Any continuous surjection between compact Hausdorff spaces has an irreducible restriction to a closed subset of its domain.

392:

\(C(LO,LO)\): Every linearly ordered set of linearly orderable sets has a choice function.

393:

\(C(LO,WO)\): Every linearly ordered set of non-empty well orderable sets has a choice function.

165:

\(C(WO,WO)\):  Every well ordered family of non-empty, well orderable sets has a choice function.

324:

\(KW(WO,WO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a well ordered family of well orderable sets: For every well ordered set \(M\) of well orderable sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 15.)

Comment:

Back