We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
| Implication | Reference |
|---|---|
| 302 \(\Rightarrow\) 392 | clear |
| 392 \(\Rightarrow\) 394 | clear |
| 394 \(\Rightarrow\) 397 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 302: | Any continuous surjection between compact Hausdorff spaces has an irreducible restriction to a closed subset of its domain. |
| 392: | \(C(LO,LO)\): Every linearly ordered set of linearly orderable sets has a choice function. |
| 394: | \(C(WO,LO)\): Every well ordered set of non-empty linearly orderable sets has a choice function. |
| 397: | \(MC(WO,LO)\): For each well ordered family of non-empty linearly orderable sets \(X\), there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\) \(f(x)\) is a non-empty, finite subset of \(x\). |
Comment: