We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

398 \(\Rightarrow\) 324
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
398 \(\Rightarrow\) 322 clear
322 \(\Rightarrow\) 324 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
398:

\(KW(LO,\infty)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a linearly ordered family of sets: For every linearly ordered set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\).

322:

\(KW(WO,\infty)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a well ordered family of sets: For every  well ordered set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\).  (See Form 15).

324:

\(KW(WO,WO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a well ordered family of well orderable sets: For every well ordered set \(M\) of well orderable sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 15.)

Comment:

Back