We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
3 \(\Rightarrow\) 4 |
Russell's alternative to the axiom of choice, Howard, P. 1992, Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. Cardinal addition and the axiom of choice, Howard, P. 1974, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. note-27 |
4 \(\Rightarrow\) 405 | clear |
405 \(\Rightarrow\) 75 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
3: | \(2m = m\): For all infinite cardinals \(m\), \(2m = m\). |
4: | Every infinite set is the union of some disjoint family of denumerable subsets. (Denumerable means \(\cong \aleph_0\).) |
405: | Every infinite set can be partitioned into sets each of which is countable and has at least two elements. |
75: | If a set has at least two elements, then it can be partitioned into well orderable subsets, each of which has at least two elements. |
Comment: