Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

399 \(\Rightarrow\) 308-p given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
399 \(\Rightarrow\) 323	clear
323 \(\Rightarrow\) 62	note-70
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 308-p	Maximal p-subgroups and the axiom of choice, Howard-Yorke-1987 [1987, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
399:	\(KW(\infty,LO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a set of linearly orderable sets: For every set of linearly orderable sets \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(\|A\|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\).
323:	\(KW(\infty,WO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a family of well orderable sets: For every set \(M\) of well orderable sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(\|A\| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 15.)
62:	\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.
308-p:	If \(p\) is a prime and if \(\{G_y: y\in Y\}\) is a set of finite groups, then the weak direct product \(\prod_{y\in Y}G_y\) has a maximal \(p\)-subgroup.

Comment:

Back