We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
331 \(\Rightarrow\) 332 |
Topologie, Analyse Nonstandard et Axiome du Choix, Morillon, M. 1988, Universit\'e Blaise-Pascal |
332 \(\Rightarrow\) 343 |
Topologie, Analyse Nonstandard et Axiome du Choix, Morillon, M. 1988, Universit\'e Blaise-Pascal |
343 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | clear |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 61 | clear |
61 \(\Rightarrow\) 88 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
331: | If \((X_i)_{i\in I}\) is a family of compact non-empty topological spaces then there is a family \((F_i)_{i\in I}\) such that \(\forall i\in I\), \(F_i\) is an irreducible closed subset of \(X_i\). |
332: | A product of non-empty compact sober topological spaces is non-empty. |
343: | A product of non-empty, compact \(T_2\) topological spaces is non-empty. |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
61: | \((\forall n\in\omega, n\ge 2\))\((C(\infty,n))\): For each \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\), every set of \(n\) element sets has a choice function. |
88: | \(C(\infty ,2)\): Every family of pairs has a choice function. |
Comment: