Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

332 \(\Rightarrow\) 11
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
332 \(\Rightarrow\) 343 Topologie, Analyse Nonstandard et Axiome du Choix, Morillon, M. 1988, Universit\'e Blaise-Pascal
343 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 clear
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 61 clear
61 \(\Rightarrow\) 11 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
332:  

A product of non-empty compact sober topological spaces is non-empty.

343:

A product of non-empty, compact \(T_2\) topological spaces is non-empty.

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

61:

\((\forall n\in\omega, n\ge 2\))\((C(\infty,n))\): For each \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\), every set of \(n\) element  sets has a choice function.

11:

A Form of Restricted Choice for Families of Finite Sets: For every infinite set \(A\), \(A\) has an infinite subset \(B\) such that for every \(n\in\omega\), \(n>0\), the set of all \(n\) element subsets of \(B\) has a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco [1998b]

Comment:

Back