Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

332 \(\Rightarrow\) 327
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
332 \(\Rightarrow\) 343 Topologie, Analyse Nonstandard et Axiome du Choix, Morillon, M. 1988, Universit\'e Blaise-Pascal
343 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 clear
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 121 clear
121 \(\Rightarrow\) 122 clear
122 \(\Rightarrow\) 327 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
332:  

A product of non-empty compact sober topological spaces is non-empty.

343:

A product of non-empty, compact \(T_2\) topological spaces is non-empty.

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

121:

\(C(LO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every linearly ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

122:

\(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

327:

\(KW(WO,<\aleph_0)\),  The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a well ordered family of finite sets: For every well ordered set \(M\) of finite sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\)  then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 15.)

Comment:

Back