We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
335-n \(\Rightarrow\) 333 |
Bases for vector spaces over the two element field and the axiom of choice, Keremedis, K. 1996a, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. |
333 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 | clear |
67 \(\Rightarrow\) 89 |
On cardinals and their successors, Jech, T. 1966a, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys. |
89 \(\Rightarrow\) 90 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 133 |
90 \(\Rightarrow\) 51 |
Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
51 \(\Rightarrow\) 25 |
Choice and cofinal well-ordered subsets, Morris, D.B. 1969, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. |
25 \(\Rightarrow\) 34 | clear |
34 \(\Rightarrow\) 104 | clear |
104 \(\Rightarrow\) 182 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
335-n: | Every quotient group of an Abelian group each of whose elements has order \(\le n\) has a set of representatives. |
333: | \(MC(\infty,\infty,\mathrm{odd})\): For every set \(X\) of sets such that for all \(x\in X\), \(|x|\ge 1\), there is a function \(f\) such that for every \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a finite, non-empty subset of \(x\) and \(|f(x)|\) is odd. |
67: | \(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite). |
89: | Antichain Principle: Every partially ordered set has a maximal antichain. Jech [1973b], p 133. |
90: | \(LW\): Every linearly ordered set can be well ordered. Jech [1973b], p 133. |
51: | Cofinality Principle: Every linear ordering has a cofinal sub well ordering. Sierpi\'nski [1918], p 117. |
25: | \(\aleph _{\beta +1}\) is regular for all ordinals \(\beta\). |
34: | \(\aleph_{1}\) is regular. |
104: | There is a regular uncountable aleph. Jech [1966b], p 165 prob 11.26. |
182: | There is an aleph whose cofinality is greater than \(\aleph_{0}\). |
Comment: