We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
421 \(\Rightarrow\) 338 | clear |
338 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 | clear |
32 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 | clear |
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 423 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
421: | \(UT(\aleph_0,WO,WO)\): The union of a denumerable set of well orderable sets can be well ordered. |
338: | \(UT(\aleph_0,\aleph_0,WO)\): The union of a denumerable number of denumerable sets is well orderable. |
32: | \(C(\aleph_0,\le\aleph_0)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty countable sets has a choice function. |
10: | \(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
423: | \(\forall n\in \omega-\{o,1\}\), \(C(\aleph_0, n)\) : For every \(n\in \omega - \{0,1\}\), every denumerable set of \(n\) element sets has a choice function. |
Comment: