We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
376 \(\Rightarrow\) 377 |
Weak choice principles, De la Cruz, O. 1998a, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. |
377 \(\Rightarrow\) 378 | clear |
378 \(\Rightarrow\) 336-n | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
376: | Restricted Kinna Wagner Principle: For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) and a function \(f\) such that for every \(z\subseteq Y\), if \(|z| \ge 2\) then \(f(z)\) is a non-empty proper subset of \(z\). |
377: | Restricted Ordering Principle: For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) such that \(Y\) can be linearly ordered. |
378: | Restricted Choice for Families of Well Ordered Sets: For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) such that the family of non-empty well orderable subsets of \(Y\) has a choice function. |
336-n: | (For \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\).) For every infinite set \(X\), there is an infinite \(Y \subseteq X\) such that the set of all \(n\)-element subsets of \(Y\) has a choice function. |
Comment: