We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
376 \(\Rightarrow\) 377 |
Weak choice principles, De la Cruz, O. 1998a, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. |
377 \(\Rightarrow\) 378 | clear |
378 \(\Rightarrow\) 132 |
Weak choice principles, De la Cruz, O. 1998a, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. |
132 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 |
Amorphe Potenzen kompakter Raume, Brunner, N. 1984b, Arch. Math. Logik Grundlagenforschung |
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 358 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
376: | Restricted Kinna Wagner Principle: For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) and a function \(f\) such that for every \(z\subseteq Y\), if \(|z| \ge 2\) then \(f(z)\) is a non-empty proper subset of \(z\). |
377: | Restricted Ordering Principle: For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) such that \(Y\) can be linearly ordered. |
378: | Restricted Choice for Families of Well Ordered Sets: For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) such that the family of non-empty well orderable subsets of \(Y\) has a choice function. |
132: | \(PC(\infty, <\aleph_0,\infty)\): Every infinite family of finite sets has an infinite subfamily with a choice function. |
10: | \(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
358: | \(KW(\aleph_0,<\aleph_0)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a denumerable family of finite sets: For every denumerable set \(M\) of finite sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). |
Comment: