Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

214 \(\Rightarrow\) 98
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
214 \(\Rightarrow\) 9 clear
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 98 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
214:

\(Z(\omega)\): For every family \(A\) of infinite sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in A\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty subset of \(y\) and \(|f(y)|=\aleph_{0}\).

9:

Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.

98:

The set of all finite subsets of a Dedekind finite set is Dedekind finite. Jech [1973b] p 161 prob 11.5.

Comment:

Back