Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

391 \(\Rightarrow\) 400 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
391 \(\Rightarrow\) 392	clear
392 \(\Rightarrow\) 400	clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
391:	\(C(\infty,LO)\): Every set of non-empty linearly orderable sets has a choice function.
392:	\(C(LO,LO)\): Every linearly ordered set of linearly orderable sets has a choice function.
400:	\(KW(LO,LO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a linearly ordered set of linearly orderable sets: For every linearly ordered set of linearly orderable sets \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(\|A\|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\).

Comment:

Back