Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

391 \(\Rightarrow\) 48-K
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
391 \(\Rightarrow\) 392 clear
392 \(\Rightarrow\) 393 clear
393 \(\Rightarrow\) 121 clear
121 \(\Rightarrow\) 120-K clear
120-K \(\Rightarrow\) 48-K clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
391:

\(C(\infty,LO)\): Every set of non-empty linearly orderable sets has a choice function.

392:

\(C(LO,LO)\): Every linearly ordered set of linearly orderable sets has a choice function.

393:

\(C(LO,WO)\): Every linearly ordered set of non-empty well orderable sets has a choice function.

121:

\(C(LO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every linearly ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

120-K:

If \(K\subseteq\omega-\{0,1\}\), \(C(LO,K)\): Every linearly ordered set of non-empty sets each of whose cardinality is in \(K\) has a choice function.

48-K:

If \(K\) is a finite subset of \(\omega-\{0,1\}\), \(C(WO,K)\): For every \(n\in K,\) \(C(WO,n)\).

Comment:

Back