Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

395 \(\Rightarrow\) 330
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
395 \(\Rightarrow\) 396 clear
396 \(\Rightarrow\) 330 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
395:

\(MC(LO,LO)\): For each linearly ordered family of non-empty linearly orderable sets \(X\), there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\) \(f(x)\) is a non-empty, finite subset of \(x\).

396:

\(MC(LO,WO)\): For each linearly ordered family of non-empty well orderable sets \(X\), there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\) \(f(x)\) is a non-empty, finite subset of \(x\).

330:

\(MC(WO,WO)\): For every well ordered set \(X\) of well orderable sets such that for all \(x\in X\), \(|x|\ge 1\), there is a function \(f\) such that for every \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a finite, non-empty subset of \(x\).  (See Form 67.)

Comment:

Back