Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

399 \(\Rightarrow\) 403 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
399 \(\Rightarrow\) 400	clear
400 \(\Rightarrow\) 403	clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
399:	\(KW(\infty,LO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a set of linearly orderable sets: For every set of linearly orderable sets \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(\|A\|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\).
400:	\(KW(LO,LO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a linearly ordered set of linearly orderable sets: For every linearly ordered set of linearly orderable sets \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(\|A\|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\).
403:	\(KW(LO,WO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a linearly ordered set of well orderable sets: For every linearly ordered set of well orderable sets \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(\|A\|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\).

Comment:

Back