Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

400 \(\Rightarrow\) 324
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
400 \(\Rightarrow\) 402 clear
402 \(\Rightarrow\) 324 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
400:

\(KW(LO,LO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a linearly ordered set of linearly orderable sets: For every linearly ordered set of linearly orderable sets \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\).

402:

\(KW(WO,LO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a well ordered set of linearly orderable sets: For every well ordered set of linearly orderable sets \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\).

324:

\(KW(WO,WO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a well ordered family of well orderable sets: For every well ordered set \(M\) of well orderable sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 15.)

Comment:

Back