Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

410 \(\Rightarrow\) 249
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
410 \(\Rightarrow\) 411 clear
411 \(\Rightarrow\) 412 clear
412 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 The Baire category property and some notions of compactness, Fossy, J. 1998, J. London Math. Soc.
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 249

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
410:

RC (Reflexive Compactness): The closed unit ball of a reflexive normed space is compact for the weak topology.

411:

RCuc (Reflexive Compactness for uniformly convex Banach spaces): The closed unit ball of a uniformly convex Banach space is compact for the weak topology.

412:

RCh (Reflexive Compactness for Hilbert spaces): The closed unit ball of a Hilbert space is compact for the weak topology.

10:

\(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\):  Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

249:

If \(T\) is an infinite tree in which every element has exactly 2 immediate successors then \(T\) has an infinite branch.

Comment:

Back