Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

419 \(\Rightarrow\) 19
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
419 \(\Rightarrow\) 420 Metric spaces and the axiom of choice, De-la-Cruz-Hall-Howard-Keremedis-Rubin-2002A[2002A], Math. Logic Quart.
420 \(\Rightarrow\) 34 Metric spaces and the axiom of choice, De-la-Cruz-Hall-Howard-Keremedis-Rubin-2002A[2002A], Math. Logic Quart.
34 \(\Rightarrow\) 19 Sur les fonctions representables analytiquement, Lebesgue, H. 1905, J. Math. Pures Appl.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
419:

UT(\(\aleph_0\),cuf,cuf): The union of a denumerable set of cuf sets is cuf. (A set is cuf if it is a countable union of finite sets.)

420:

\(UT(\aleph_0\),\(\aleph_0\),cuf): The union of a denumerable set of denumerable sets is cuf.

34:

\(\aleph_{1}\) is regular.

19:

A real function is analytically representable if and only if it is in Baire's classification. G.Moore [1982], equation (2.3.1).

Comment:

Back