Implications

• Implications Home
• Code 1 Implications
• Code 2 Implications
• Code 3 Implications
• Code 4 Implications
• Code 5 Implications
• Code 6 Implications
• Complete List
• Search

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

78 \(\Rightarrow\) 155 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
78 \(\Rightarrow\) 155	Geordnete Lauchli Kontinuen, Brunner, N. 1983a, Fund. Math.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
78:	Urysohn's Lemma:  If \(A\) and \(B\) are disjoint closed sets in a normal space \(S\), then there is a continuous \(f:S\rightarrow [0,1]\) which is 1 everywhere in \(A\) and 0 everywhere in \(B\). Urysohn [1925], pp 290-292.
155:	\(LC\): There are no non-trivial Läuchli continua. (A Läuchli continuum is a strongly connected continuum. Continuum \(\equiv\) compact, connected, Hausdorff space; and strongly connected \(\equiv\) every continuous real valued function is constant.)

Comment: