We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
82 \(\Rightarrow\) 387 |
"Dense orderings, partitions, and weak forms of choice", Gonzalez, C. 1995a, Fund. Math. |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
82: | \(E(I,III)\) (Howard/Yorke [1989]): If \(X\) is infinite then \(\cal P(X)\) is Dedekind infinite. (\(X\) is finite \(\Leftrightarrow {\cal P}(X)\) is Dedekind finite.) |
387: | DPO: Every infinite set has a non-trivial, dense partial order. (A partial ordering \(<\) on a set \(X\) is dense if \((\forall x, y\in X)(x \lt y \to (\exists z \in X)(x \lt z \lt y))\) and is non-trivial if \((\exists x,y\in X)(x \lt y)\)). |
Comment: