Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

262 \(\Rightarrow\) 255
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
262 \(\Rightarrow\) 255 Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
262:

\(Z(TR,R)\): Every transitive relation \((X,R)\) in which every ramified subset \(A\) has an upper bound, has a maximal element.

255:

\(Z(D,R)\): Every directed relation \((P,R)\) in which every ramified subset \(A\) has an upper bound, has a maximal element.

Comment:

Back