Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

203 \(\Rightarrow\) 211
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
203 \(\Rightarrow\) 211 Non-constructive properties of the real numbers, Howard, P. 2001, Math. Logic Quart.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
203:

\(C\)(disjoint,\(\subseteq\Bbb R)\): Every partition of \({\cal P}(\omega)\) into non-empty subsets has a choice function.

211:

\(DCR\): Dependent choice for relations on \(\Bbb R\): If \(R\subseteq\Bbb R\times\Bbb R\) satisfies \((\forall x\in \Bbb R)(\exists y\in\Bbb R)(x\mathrel R y)\) then there is a sequence \(\langle x(n): n\in\omega\rangle\) of real numbers such that \((\forall n\in\omega)(x(n)\mathrel R x(n+1))\).

Comment:

Back