Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

161 \(\Rightarrow\) 358 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
161 \(\Rightarrow\) 9	Defining cardinal addition by \(le\)-formulas, Haussler, A. 1983, Fund. Math.
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 10	Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, 1982, 322
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 358	clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
161:	Definability of cardinal addition in terms of \(\le\): There is a first order formula whose only non-logical symbol is \( \le \) (for cardinals) that defines cardinal addition.
9:	Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.
10:	\(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.
358:	\(KW(\aleph_0,<\aleph_0)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a denumerable family of finite sets: For every denumerable set \(M\) of finite sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(\|A\| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\).

Comment:

Back