We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

3 \(\Rightarrow\) 186
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
3 \(\Rightarrow\) 186 Set theory for the mathematician, Rubin, [1967]

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
3:  \(2m = m\): For all infinite cardinals \(m\), \(2m = m\).
186:

Every pair of cardinal numbers has a least upper bound (in the usual cardinal ordering.)

Comment:

Back