We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
3 \(\Rightarrow\) 186 | Set theory for the mathematician, Rubin, [1967] |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
3: | \(2m = m\): For all infinite cardinals \(m\), \(2m = m\). |
186: | Every pair of cardinal numbers has a least upper bound (in the usual cardinal ordering.) |
Comment: