Implications

• Implications Home
• Code 1 Implications
• Code 2 Implications
• Code 3 Implications
• Code 4 Implications
• Code 5 Implications
• Code 6 Implications
• Complete List
• Search

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

2 \(\Rightarrow\) 3 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
2 \(\Rightarrow\) 3	On successors in cardinal arithmetic, Truss, J. K. 1973c, Fund. Math.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
2:	Existence of successor cardinals: For every cardinal \(m\) there is a cardinal \(n\) such that \(m < n\) and \((\forall p < n)(p \le m)\).
3:	\(2m = m\): For all infinite cardinals \(m\), \(2m = m\).

Comment: