We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
88 \(\Rightarrow\) 64 |
Classes of Dedekind finite cardinals, Truss, J. K. 1974a, Fund. Math. |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
88: | \(C(\infty ,2)\): Every family of pairs has a choice function. |
64: | \(E(I,Ia)\) There are no amorphous sets. (Equivalently, every infinite set is the union of two disjoint infinite sets.) |
Comment: