We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

363 \(\Rightarrow\) 38
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
363 \(\Rightarrow\) 38 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
363:

There are exactly \(2^{\aleph_0}\) Borel sets in \(\Bbb R\). G. Moore [1982], p 325.

38:

\({\Bbb R}\) is not the union of a countable family of countable sets.

Comment:

Back