We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
| Implication | Reference |
|---|---|
| 363 \(\Rightarrow\) 38 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 363: | There are exactly \(2^{\aleph_0}\) Borel sets in \(\Bbb R\). G. Moore [1982], p 325. |
| 38: | \({\Bbb R}\) is not the union of a countable family of countable sets. |
Comment: