We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
296 \(\Rightarrow\) 64 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
296: | Part-\(\infty\): Every infinite set is the disjoint union of infinitely many infinite sets. |
64: | \(E(I,Ia)\) There are no amorphous sets. (Equivalently, every infinite set is the union of two disjoint infinite sets.) |
Comment: