We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
364 \(\Rightarrow\) 273 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
364: | In \(\Bbb R\), there is a measurable set that is not Borel. G. Moore [1982], p 325. |
273: | There is a subset of \({\Bbb R}\) which is not Borel. |
Comment: