Hypothesis: HR 64:

\(E(I,Ia)\) There are no amorphous sets. (Equivalently, every infinite set is the union of two disjoint infinite sets.)

Conclusion: HR 83:

\(E(I,II)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]: \(T\)-finite is equivalent to finite.

List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N4\) The Mathias/Pincus Model I \(A\) is countably infinite;\(\precsim\) is a universal homogeneous partial ordering on \(A\) (See<a href="/articles/Jech-1973b">Jech [1973b]</a> p 101 for definitions.); \(\cal G\) is the group ofall order automorphisms on \((A,\precsim)\); and \(S\) is the set of allfinite subsets of \(A\)

Code: 3

Comments:


Edit | Back