Hypothesis: HR 0:  \(0 = 0\).

Conclusion: HR 47-n:

If \(n\in\omega-\{0,1\}\), \(C(WO,n)\): Every well ordered collection of \(n\)-element sets has a choice function.

List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal M7(n)\) Generalization of \(\cal M7\) Model <a href="/models/Cohen-2">\(\cal M7\)</a> can be generalized to \(n\) denumerable sets for \(1 \le n \in\omega\), then the Axiom of Choice for a denumerable number of \(n\) element sets, \(C(\aleph_0,n)\), is false for \(1 \le n \le \omega\)
\(\cal M47(n,M)\) Pincus' Model IX This is the model of <a href="/articles/Pincus-1977a">Pincus [1977a]</a>, Theorem 2.1 \((E)\)
\(\cal N2(n)\) A generalization of \(\cal N2\) This is a generalization of\(\cal N2\) in which there is a denumerable set of \(n\) element sets for\(n\in\omega - \{0,1\}\)
\(\cal N2^*(3)\) Howard's variation of \(\cal N2(3)\) \(A=\bigcup B\), where\(B\) is a set of pairwise disjoint 3 element sets, \(T_i = \{a_i, b_i,c_i\}\)
\(\cal N2(n,M)\) Mostowski's variation of \(\cal N2(n)\) \(A\), \(B\), and \(S\)are the same as in \(\cal N2(n)\)
\(\cal N22(p)\) Makowski/Wi\'sniewski/Mostowski Model (Where \(p\) is aprime) Let \(A=\bigcup\{A_i: i\in\omega\}\) where The \(A_i\)'s are pairwisedisjoint and each has cardinality \(p\)
\(\cal N49\) De la Cruz/Di Prisco Model Let \(A = \{ a(i,p) : i\in\omega\land p\in {\Bbb Q}/{\Bbb Z} \}\)

Code: 3

Comments:


Edit | Back