Implications

This non-implication, Form 194 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 111, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 592, whose string of implications is:
    8 \(\Rightarrow\) 16 \(\Rightarrow\) 194
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 267, Form 8 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 111 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 8 <p> \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\): </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 111 <p> \(UT(WO,2,WO)\): The union of an infinite well ordered set of 2-element sets is an infinite well ordered set. </p>

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this last code 2/1 implication

The conclusion Form 194 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 111 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N2(\aleph_{\alpha})\) Jech's Model This is an extension of \(\cal N2\) in which \(A=\{a_{\gamma} : \gamma\in\omega_{\alpha}\}\); \(B\) is the corresponding set of \(\aleph_{\alpha}\) pairs of elements of \(A\); \(\cal G\)is the group of all permutations on \(A\) that leave \(B\) point-wise fixed;and \(S\) is the set of all subsets of \(A\) of cardinality less than\(\aleph_{\alpha}\)

Edit | Back