Implications

This non-implication, Form 280 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 201, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 10287, whose string of implications is:
    142 \(\Rightarrow\) 280
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 239, Form 142 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 93 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 142 <p> \(\neg  PB\):  There is a set of reals without the property of Baire.  <a href="/books/8">Jech [1973b]</a>, p. 7. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 93 <p> There is a non-measurable subset of \({\Bbb R}\). </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 6365, whose string of implications is:
    201 \(\Rightarrow\) 88 \(\Rightarrow\) 93

The conclusion Form 280 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 201 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal M38\) Shelah's Model II In a model of \(ZFC +\) "\(\kappa\) is a strongly inaccessible cardinal", Shelah uses Levy's method of collapsing cardinals to collapse \(\kappa\) to \(\aleph_1\) similarly to <a href="/articles/Solovay-1970">Solovay [1970]</a>

Edit | Back