Implications

This non-implication, Form 325 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 201, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this first code 2/1 implication.
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 919, Form 325 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 64 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 325 <p> <strong>Ramsey's Theorem II:</strong> \(\forall n,m\in\omega\), if A is an infinite set and the family of all \(m\) element subsets of \(A\) is partitioned into \(n\) sets \(S_{j}, 1\le j\le n\), then there is an infinite subset \(B\subseteq A\) such that all \(m\) element subsets of \(B\) belong to the same \(S_{j}\). (Also, see <a href="/form-classes/howard-rubin-17">Form 17</a>.) </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 64 <p> \(E(I,Ia)\) There are no amorphous sets. (Equivalently, every infinite set is the union of two disjoint infinite sets.) </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 6353, whose string of implications is:
    201 \(\Rightarrow\) 88 \(\Rightarrow\) 64

The conclusion Form 325 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 201 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N1\) The Basic Fraenkel Model The set of atoms, \(A\) is denumerable; \(\cal G\) is the group of all permutations on \(A\); and \(S\) isthe set of all finite subsets of \(A\)

Edit | Back