This non-implication, Form 387 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 301, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 1654, whose string of implications is:
    15 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 \(\Rightarrow\) 387
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 1266, Form 15 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 300 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 15 <p> \(KW(\infty,\infty)\) (KW), <strong>The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle:</strong> For every  set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See <a href="/form-classes/howard-rubin-81($n$)">Form 81(\(n\))</a>.   </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 300 <p> Any continuous surjection between extremally disconnected compact Hausdorff spaces has an irreducible restriction to a closed subset of its domain. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 9606, whose string of implications is:
    301 \(\Rightarrow\) 300

The conclusion Form 387 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 301 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal M1\) Cohen's original model Add a denumerable number of generic reals (subsets of \(\omega\)), \(a_1\), \(a_2\), \(\cdots\), along with the set \(b\) containing them

Edit | Back