Implications

This non-implication, Form 24 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 201, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 2565, whose string of implications is:
    44 \(\Rightarrow\) 39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 \(\Rightarrow\) 24
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 158, Form 44 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 88 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 44 <p> \(DC(\aleph _{1})\):  Given a relation \(R\) such that for every  subset \(Y\) of a set \(X\) with \(|Y| < \aleph_{1}\) there is an \(x \in  X\)  with \(Y \mathrel R x\), then there is a function \(f: \aleph_{1} \rightarrow  X\) such that \((\forall\beta < \aleph_{1}) (\{f(\gamma ): \gamma < b \} \mathrel R f(\beta))\). </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 88 <p>  \(C(\infty ,2)\):  Every family of pairs has a choice function. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 9871, whose string of implications is:
    201 \(\Rightarrow\) 88

The conclusion Form 24 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 201 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N2(\aleph_{\alpha})\) Jech's Model This is an extension of \(\cal N2\) in which \(A=\{a_{\gamma} : \gamma\in\omega_{\alpha}\}\); \(B\) is the corresponding set of \(\aleph_{\alpha}\) pairs of elements of \(A\); \(\cal G\)is the group of all permutations on \(A\) that leave \(B\) point-wise fixed;and \(S\) is the set of all subsets of \(A\) of cardinality less than\(\aleph_{\alpha}\)

Edit | Back