Implications

This non-implication, Form 35 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 99, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 6946, whose string of implications is:
    51 \(\Rightarrow\) 337 \(\Rightarrow\) 92 \(\Rightarrow\) 94 \(\Rightarrow\) 35
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 956, Form 51 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 99 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 51 <p> <strong>Cofinality Principle:</strong> Every linear ordering has a cofinal sub well ordering.  <a href="/articles/Sierpi\'nski-1918">Sierpi\'nski [1918]</a>, p 117. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 99 <p> <strong>Rado's Selection Lemma:</strong> Let \(\{K(\lambda): \lambda \in\Lambda\}\) be a family  of finite subsets (of \(X\)) and suppose for each finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a function \(\gamma(S): S \rightarrow X\) such that \((\forall\lambda\in S)(\gamma(S)(\lambda)\in K(\lambda))\).  Then there is an \(f: \Lambda\rightarrow X\) such that for every finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a finite \(T\) such that \(S\subseteq T\subseteq\Lambda\) and such that \(f\) and \(\gamma (T)\) agree on S. </p>

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this last code 2/1 implication

The conclusion Form 35 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 99 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal M14\) Morris' Model I This is an extension of Mathias' model, <a href="/models/Mathias-1">\(\cal M3\)</a>

Edit | Back