Axiom Of Choice

This non-implication, Form 211 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 127, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:
Note: This non-implication is actually a code 4, as this non-implication satisfies the transferability criterion. Click Transfer details for all the details)

An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 9758, whose string of implications is: 337 \(\Rightarrow\) 211

A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 686, Form 337 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 127 whose summary information is:

Hypothesis	Statement
Form 337	<p> \(C(WO\), <strong>uniformly linearly ordered</strong>): If \(X\) is a well ordered collection of non-empty sets and there is a function \(f\) defined on \(X\) such that for every \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a linear ordering of \(x\), then there is a choice function for \(X\). </p>

Conclusion	Statement
Form 127	<p> An amorphous power of a compact \(T_2\) space, which as a set is well orderable, is well orderable. </p>

This non-implication was constructed without the use of this last code 2/1 implication

The conclusion Form 211 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 127 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name	Statement
\(\cal N24\) Hickman's Model I	This model is a variation of \(\cal N2\)

Implications