Implications

This non-implication, Form 211 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 17, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:
Note: This non-implication is actually a code 4, as this non-implication satisfies the transferability criterion. Click Transfer details for all the details)

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 9758, whose string of implications is:
    337 \(\Rightarrow\) 211
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 685, Form 337 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 124 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 337 <p> \(C(WO\), <strong>uniformly linearly ordered</strong>):  If \(X\) is a well ordered collection of non-empty sets and there is a function \(f\) defined on \(X\) such that for every \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a linear ordering of \(x\), then there is a choice function for \(X\). </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 124 <p> Every operator on a Hilbert space with an amorphous base is the direct sum of a finite matrix and  a  scalar operator.  (A set is <em>amorphous</em> if it is not the union of two disjoint infinite sets.) </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 9632, whose string of implications is:
    17 \(\Rightarrow\) 124

The conclusion Form 211 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 17 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N24\) Hickman's Model I This model is a variation of \(\cal N2\)

Edit | Back