This non-implication,
Form 223 \( \not \Rightarrow \)
Form 165,
whose code is 6,
is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:
Note: This non-implication is actually a code 4, as this non-implication satisfies the
transferability criterion. Click
Transfer details for all the details)
Hypothesis | Statement |
---|---|
Form 99 | <p> <strong>Rado's Selection Lemma:</strong> Let \(\{K(\lambda): \lambda \in\Lambda\}\) be a family of finite subsets (of \(X\)) and suppose for each finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a function \(\gamma(S): S \rightarrow X\) such that \((\forall\lambda\in S)(\gamma(S)(\lambda)\in K(\lambda))\). Then there is an \(f: \Lambda\rightarrow X\) such that for every finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a finite \(T\) such that \(S\subseteq T\subseteq\Lambda\) and such that \(f\) and \(\gamma (T)\) agree on S. </p> |
Conclusion | Statement |
---|---|
Form 324 | <p> \(KW(WO,WO)\), <strong>The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a well ordered family of well orderable sets:</strong> For every well ordered set \(M\) of well orderable sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See <a href="/form-classes/howard-rubin-15">Form 15</a>.) </p> |
The conclusion Form 223 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 165 then follows.
Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:
Name | Statement |
---|---|
\(\cal N2\) The Second Fraenkel Model | The set of atoms \(A=\{a_i : i\in\omega\}\) is partitioned into two element sets \(B =\{\{a_{2i},a_{2i+1}\} : i\in\omega\}\). \(\mathcal G \) is the group of all permutations of \( A \) that leave \( B \) pointwise fixed and \( S \) is the set of all finite subsets of \( A \). |