Implications

This non-implication, Form 357 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 97, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 2334, whose string of implications is:
    16 \(\Rightarrow\) 352 \(\Rightarrow\) 31 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 \(\Rightarrow\) 357
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 13, Form 16 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 97 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 16 <p> \(C(\aleph_{0},\le 2^{\aleph_{0}})\):  Every denumerable collection of non-empty sets  each with power \(\le  2^{\aleph_{0}}\) has a choice function. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 97 <p> <strong>Cardinal Representatives:</strong> For every set \(A\) there is a function \(c\) with domain \({\cal P}(A)\) such that for all \(x, y\in {\cal P}(A)\), (i) \(c(x) = c(y) \leftrightarrow x\approx y\) and (ii) \(c(x)\approx x\).  <a href="/books/8">Jech [1973b]</a> p 154. </p>

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this last code 2/1 implication

The conclusion Form 357 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 97 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N3\) Mostowski's Linearly Ordered Model \(A\) is countably infinite;\(\precsim\) is a dense linear ordering on \(A\) without first or lastelements (\((A,\precsim) \cong (\Bbb Q,\le)\)); \(\cal G\) is the group of allorder automorphisms on \((A,\precsim)\); and \(S\) is the set of all finitesubsets of \(A\)

Edit | Back