Fraenkel \(\cal N53\): Good/Tree/Watson Model I | Back to this models page
Description: Let \(A=\bigcup \{Q_n:\ n\in\omega\}\), where \(Q_n=\{a_{n,q}:q\in \Bbb{Q}\}\)
When the book was first being written, only the following form classes were known to be true in this model:
| Form Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 6 | \(UT(\aleph_0,\aleph_0,\aleph_0,\Bbb R)\): The union of a denumerable family of denumerable subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) is denumerable. |
| 9 | Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite. |
| 37 | Lebesgue measure is countably additive. |
| 63 |
\(SPI\): Weak ultrafilter principle: Every infinite set has a non-trivial ultrafilter.
|
| 91 | \(PW\): The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered. |
| 130 | \({\cal P}(\Bbb R)\) is well orderable. |
| 273 | There is a subset of \({\Bbb R}\) which is not Borel. |
| 305 | There are \(2^{\aleph_0}\) Vitali equivalence classes. (Vitali equivalence classes are equivalence classes of the real numbers under the relation \(x\equiv y\leftrightarrow(\exists q\in{\Bbb Q})(x-y=q)\).). \ac{Kanovei} \cite{1991}. |
| 309 | The Banach-Tarski Paradox: There are three finite partitions \(\{P_1,\ldots\), \(P_n\}\), \(\{Q_1,\ldots,Q_r\}\) and \(\{S_1,\ldots,S_n, T_1,\ldots,T_r\}\) of \(B^3 = \{x\in {\Bbb R}^3 : |x| \le 1\}\) such that \(P_i\) is congruent to \(S_i\) for \(1\le i\le n\) and \(Q_i\) is congruent to \(T_i\) for \(1\le i\le r\). |
| 313 | \(\Bbb Z\) (the set of integers under addition) is amenable. (\(G\) is {\it amenable} if there is a finitely additive measure \(\mu\) on \(\cal P(G)\) such that \(\mu(G) = 1\) and \(\forall A\subseteq G, \forall g\in G\), \(\mu(gA)=\mu(A)\).) |
| 361 | In \(\Bbb R\), the union of a denumerable number of analytic sets is analytic. G. Moore [1982], pp 181 and 325. |
| 363 | There are exactly \(2^{\aleph_0}\) Borel sets in \(\Bbb R\). G. Moore [1982], p 325. |
When the book was first being written, only the following form classes were known to be false in this model:
| Form Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 88 | \(C(\infty ,2)\): Every family of pairs has a choice function. |
| 133 | Every set is either well orderable or has an infinite amorphous subset. |
| 192 | \(EP\) sets: For every set \(A\) there is a projective set \(X\) and a function from \(X\) onto \(A\). |
| 232 | Every metric space \((X,d)\) has a \(\sigma\)-point finite base. |
| 337 | \(C(WO\), uniformly linearly ordered): If \(X\) is a well ordered collection of non-empty sets and there is a function \(f\) defined on \(X\) such that for every \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a linear ordering of \(x\), then there is a choice function for \(X\). |
| 344 | If \((E_i)_{i\in I}\) is a family of non-empty sets, then there is a family \((U_i)_{i\in I}\) such that \(\forall i\in I\), \(U_i\) is an ultrafilter on \(E_i\). |
| 382 | DUMN: The disjoint union of metrizable spaces is normal. |
Historical background:
Suppose \(<\) is thelexicographic ordering on \(A\), i.e. \(\)a_{n,q}