Fraenkel \(\cal N31\): Läuchli's Model IV | Back to this models page
Description: The set \(A\) is denumerable
When the book was first being written, only the following form classes were known to be true in this model:
| Form Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 6 | \(UT(\aleph_0,\aleph_0,\aleph_0,\Bbb R)\): The union of a denumerable family of denumerable subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) is denumerable. |
| 37 | Lebesgue measure is countably additive. |
| 91 | \(PW\): The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered. |
| 130 | \({\cal P}(\Bbb R)\) is well orderable. |
| 191 | \(SVC\): There is a set \(S\) such that for every set \(a\), there is an ordinal \(\alpha\) and a function from \(S\times\alpha\) onto \(a\). |
| 273 | There is a subset of \({\Bbb R}\) which is not Borel. |
| 305 | There are \(2^{\aleph_0}\) Vitali equivalence classes. (Vitali equivalence classes are equivalence classes of the real numbers under the relation \(x\equiv y\leftrightarrow(\exists q\in{\Bbb Q})(x-y=q)\).). \ac{Kanovei} \cite{1991}. |
| 309 | The Banach-Tarski Paradox: There are three finite partitions \(\{P_1,\ldots\), \(P_n\}\), \(\{Q_1,\ldots,Q_r\}\) and \(\{S_1,\ldots,S_n, T_1,\ldots,T_r\}\) of \(B^3 = \{x\in {\Bbb R}^3 : |x| \le 1\}\) such that \(P_i\) is congruent to \(S_i\) for \(1\le i\le n\) and \(Q_i\) is congruent to \(T_i\) for \(1\le i\le r\). |
| 313 | \(\Bbb Z\) (the set of integers under addition) is amenable. (\(G\) is {\it amenable} if there is a finitely additive measure \(\mu\) on \(\cal P(G)\) such that \(\mu(G) = 1\) and \(\forall A\subseteq G, \forall g\in G\), \(\mu(gA)=\mu(A)\).) |
| 361 | In \(\Bbb R\), the union of a denumerable number of analytic sets is analytic. G. Moore [1982], pp 181 and 325. |
| 363 | There are exactly \(2^{\aleph_0}\) Borel sets in \(\Bbb R\). G. Moore [1982], p 325. |
| 368 | The set of all denumerable subsets of \(\Bbb R\) has power \(2^{\aleph_0}\). |
| 369 | If \(\Bbb R\) is partitioned into two sets, at least one of them has cardinality \(2^{\aleph_0}\). |
When the book was first being written, only the following form classes were known to be false in this model:
| Form Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 15 | \(KW(\infty,\infty)\) (KW), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle: For every set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 81(\(n\)). |
| 241 | Every algebraic closure of \(\Bbb Q\) has a real closed subfield. |
| 243 | Every principal ideal domain is a unique factorization domain. |
| 244 | Every principal ideal domain has a maximal ideal. |
Historical background: A field, \(F\)is constructed with base set \(A\) which is isomorphic to the algebraicclosure of \(\Bbb Q\). \(\cal G\) is the set of all permutations on \(A\) thatare automorphisms on \(F\). \(S\) is the set of all finite subsets of \(A\).L\"auchli proves that in this model, \(F\) has no real closed subfield so241 is false. Also, Hodges proves that if \(R\) is the ring of integers in\(F\), then \(R\) is a principal ideal domain that is not a uniquefactorization domain and has no maximal ideal (243 and 244 are false).
Back