Fraenkel \(\cal N34\): Pincus' Model X | Back to this models page

Description: For each \(q\in\Bbb Q\), let \(C_q=\{a_q,b_q\}\), a pair of atoms and let \(A=\bigcup_{q\in\Bbb Q}C_q\)

When the book was first being written, only the following form classes were known to be true in this model:

Form Howard-Rubin Number Statement
6

\(UT(\aleph_0,\aleph_0,\aleph_0,\Bbb R)\): The union of a denumerable  family  of denumerable subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) is denumerable.

37

Lebesgue measure is countably additive.

91

\(PW\):  The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered.

130

\({\cal P}(\Bbb R)\) is well orderable.

191

\(SVC\): There is a set \(S\) such that for every set \(a\), there is an ordinal \(\alpha\) and a function from \(S\times\alpha\) onto \(a\).

216

Every infinite tree has either an infinite chain or an infinite antichain.

273

There is a subset of \({\Bbb R}\) which is not Borel.

305

There are \(2^{\aleph_0}\) Vitali equivalence classes. (Vitali equivalence classes are equivalence classes of the real numbers under the relation \(x\equiv y\leftrightarrow(\exists q\in{\Bbb Q})(x-y=q)\).). \ac{Kanovei} \cite{1991}.

309

The Banach-Tarski Paradox: There are three finite partitions \(\{P_1,\ldots\), \(P_n\}\), \(\{Q_1,\ldots,Q_r\}\) and \(\{S_1,\ldots,S_n, T_1,\ldots,T_r\}\) of \(B^3 = \{x\in {\Bbb R}^3 : |x| \le 1\}\) such that \(P_i\) is congruent to \(S_i\) for \(1\le i\le n\) and \(Q_i\) is congruent to \(T_i\) for \(1\le i\le r\).

313

\(\Bbb Z\) (the set of integers under addition) is amenable.  (\(G\) is {\it amenable} if there is a finitely additive measure \(\mu\) on \(\cal P(G)\) such that \(\mu(G) = 1\) and \(\forall A\subseteq G, \forall g\in G\), \(\mu(gA)=\mu(A)\).)

361

In \(\Bbb R\), the union of a denumerable number of analytic sets is analytic. G. Moore [1982], pp 181 and 325.

363

There are exactly \(2^{\aleph_0}\) Borel sets in \(\Bbb R\). G. Moore [1982], p 325.

368

The set of all denumerable subsets of \(\Bbb R\) has power \(2^{\aleph_0}\).

369

If \(\Bbb R\) is partitioned into two sets, at least one of them has cardinality \(2^{\aleph_0}\).

When the book was first being written, only the following form classes were known to be false in this model:

Form Howard-Rubin Number Statement
15

\(KW(\infty,\infty)\) (KW), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle: For every  set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 81(\(n\)).  

217

Every infinite partially ordered set has either an infinite chain or an infinite antichain.

Historical background: Let \(\eusb C= \{ C_q \, : q \in {\Bbb Q} \,\}\) and let \(\preceq\) be the ordering\(\eusb C\) inherits from \(\Bbb Q\). (I. e., \(C_q \preceq C_r\Leftrightarrow q \le r\) where \(\le\) is the usual ordering on \(\Bbb Q\).)Let \(\cal G\) be the group of permutations of \(A\) generated by the the twogroups\(\)\alignG_1 = \{ \phi :& (\exists f)[ f \hbox{ is an order automorphism of } {\BbbQ}\\& \land (\forall q \in {\Bbb Q})( \phi(a_q) = a_{f(q)} \land \phi(b_q) = b_{f(q)})]\,\}\endalign\(\)and\(\)\alignG_2 = \{ \psi :& \psi \hbox{ is a finite product of transposition, }\\& \psi = (a_{q_1},b_{q_1})\circ \cdots \circ (a_{q_n},b_{a_n}) \hbox{ forsome } q_1, \ldots, q_n \in {\Bbb Q}\,\}.\endalign\(\)\(G_1\) could also be described as \(\{ \phi\, : \phi : A \to A\) is one toone and onto and (the extension of) \(\phi\) is an order isomorphism of\((\eusb C, \preceq)\,\}\). \(S\) is the set of finite subsets of \(A\). Inthis model, each infinite tree has either an infinite chain or an infiniteantichain (216 is true), but there is an infinite partially ordered setthat has neither an infinite chain nor an infinite antichain (217) isfalse. (See Note 105.)

Back