We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
| Implication | Reference |
|---|---|
| 21 \(\Rightarrow\) 29 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 21: | If \(S\) is well ordered, \(\{A_{x}: x\in S\}\) and \(\{B_{x}: x\in S\}\) are families of pairwise disjoint sets, and \(|A_{x}| = |B_{x}|\) for all \(x\in S\), then \(|\bigcup_{x\in S}A_{x}|= |\bigcup_{x\in S} B_{x}|\). G\. |
| 29: | If \(|S| = \aleph_{0}\) and \(\{A_{x}: x\in S\}\) and \(\{B_{x}: x\in S\}\) are families of pairwise disjoint sets and \(|A_{x}| = |B_{x}|\) for all \(x\in S\), then \(|\bigcup^{}_{x\in S} A_{x}| = |\bigcup^{}_{x\in S} B_{x}|\). Moore, G. [1982], p 324. |
Comment: