We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
15 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 53 problem 4.12 |
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | clear |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 146 |
The axiom of choice in topology, Brunner, N. 1983d, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic note-26 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
15: | \(KW(\infty,\infty)\) (KW), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle: For every set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 81(\(n\)). |
30: | Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered. |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
146: | \(A(F,A1)\): For every \(T_2\) topological space \((X,T)\), if \(X\) is a continuous finite to one image of an A1 space then \((X,T)\) is an A1 space. (\((X,T)\) is A1 means if \(U \subseteq T\) covers \(X\) then \(\exists f : X\rightarrow U\) such that \((\forall x\in X) (x\in f(x)).)\) |
Comment: